Play

Dialectical Encounter

And how do you find me? he asks, beautiful in a tragically worn way? he hopes, suggestingly

Perhaps, she thinks to herself, perhaps there is beauty there somewhere, that would be heroinic of me to uncover amid the smell and dissheveled nature of the facts, after all, he is well-spoken

At least well-spoken, reflectively thoughtful, of subtle interest? he asks as if planting tiny seeds

I want to give him that, she muses, that he’s not dangerous or threatening in his approach, aside from his appearance, which one might surmise cannot be helped but were his lot

Ah the world a fickle thing so often colluding beauty and beast as if ’twere a fairy tale, so prominent and prevalent as to be romantic ideal, like myth

He is saying – ? Is he asking something of me? she wonders, is this monologue intended dialogue or am I giving benefit where none is due?

Bewildering collisions, he mumbles, quite obviously mistakes in the arrangements of things yet so common and continual that contingencies might point to odds, advantaging abnormal

He’s losing me, occluding, incantation, I wish to return, reorganize, retreat

I can see you’ve no further thoughts on the matter though, clearly, many there be at the tip of your every apparently avid brain, the adroitness of your eyes

The looks, the looks, always with the looks, ugh

I’d rather you think on your own, as accidents are unfortunate and impertinent. Grace be to you for peaceful easy feelings and times that would allow. No use beating bush without berries – enjoy and be oh so well, as I would be, arranged just so (grief entering his breath like tenacious little office clips)

I believe that is adieu, a baffled contradictory sort of bon voyage with accompanying melancholy of the beleaguered and accustomed to wary entertainments, he who knows where limits turn distress or ill-humored, thank god, she sighs, letting blood flow a little more freely

He turns to go and takes steps mumbling about the bizarrity of mice and their traps, cute haggard mini-rodents lured by bait, offered and tasty, but with secret intentions of pain, even elimination, not even a slap by the hand that feeds, but an almost complicit lure, disorganism’d, wonders if that’s a metaphor for public masking, to judge by appearances, he thinks

Whew, that was taxing without effort, she deflates, only now realizing how long her breath had held. What is it about hideous beauty that so spasmodically intrigues? Neither heads nor tails but the effect of the toss that unsettles, a perturbance and half-feigned interest in outcome, that it fall behind or ahead, only not now, she thinks, only be done, that is, outside present

As the pebbles tumble into cracks, inner speech hums, so encounter, his feet drudging loose bits of gravel on sidewalk, heart hoping else, legs sure of circular motion, a traveled sphere, a hamster’s wheel of wish after wish after a further furthering, each stepping distance, he whistles, he hums

Returning to the matter at hand, so distinct from what happens, she works to regain her fiction of what she was doing, but it’s those singular cracks that cause the walls to give, eventually, it turns out concentration and illusion are sometimes hard, headphones help

like the chatter of birds, the way the moments rush in and evolve noise, a void, his memory already blurred and rascally, the foregoing of who’s who and where’s that and what’s what, just some numb direction that becomes a track or path, he believes, or once thought he believed as he began, beginning again wishing the mind were silent, absent like the deafening city, submersible

as if there were an assignment, an order submitted to or taken, what remind could provide, arbitrary instruction, a purposing, a matter, at hand, only the same things as before, which were there to fill time, promote process, becoming ends

and fades

sits, and stares

N Filbert 2012

Reprehensible oversight

How could I have….?  (and there must be so many more!)

bowed in remorse and wonder….

Georgi Gospodinov

&

E. M. Cioran

instant and eternal delights

Family Reading Guide

I have been seeking a pdf version of Ronald Sukenick’s essay “The New Tradition” which I read in a wonderfully rich and challenging book of his called “In Form.”  So far I haven’t been able to find it available online but wanted so badly to provide a link to the actual text that some of you might pursue it that far and come to take it into your psyches and bodies.  Please believe me it is worth the time and effort to Inter-Library Loan this title (In Form) or uncover some of the essays therein.  I urgently recommend his work to you!  Particularly his nonfiction/essay works – from Wallace Stevens to Narratology…take delight and courage!!

 

This fictional life

Turning, Turnings Back

 

He (neuter) sets out.

In the world where “to know is to be,” he sets out.

Something changes.

In another world, “to be is to know” must pertain.

He turns back.

 

He sets out.

Into the webbing of things.

A world made of “being and having.”

He does not have. He will not be.

He turns back.

Into a world of “being and nothingness”

laid over “being and time.”

His time full of nothingness,

he ceases to be.

He turns back.

 

He sets out.

He enters a way

through a veil

marked “Nirvana.”

He is now/here.

He turns back.

 

He sets out.

He encounters.

A lover, a friend, a parent, a child.

He sets out.

He encounters.

A mountain, vocation, a suffering, a tree.

He turns back.

Part of the way.

He sets out.

Into starry realms

where “life is but a dream.”

He sings and believes.

He loves and he grieves.

He turns back.

 

He sets out. Numerically.

Where one is always one.

And one plus two is anything.

He stands at the ocean.

He turns back.

Setting out.

 

He’s set out.

He’s been seen.

He cannot forget

what he became

in that look.

Turning in.

 

He sets out.

Finding nothing in being

having the time

knowing a being

being the knowing.

He turns back.

A little way.

 

He sets out.

Underground

and pressed from all sides.

He takes space

and needs air.

He tunnels

turning back

always setting forth.

He sets out

carrying experience

in so many hands,

turning back

and all around

to set out

settling in.

 

He turns back,

holding hands,

they set out

and remain

turning about

and setting out.

N Filbert 2012

Nourishment

“It is art which makes life, makes interest, makes importance…

and I know of no substitute whatever for the force and beauty of its process”

-Henry James-

Happy Birthday Albert Goldbarth!

January 31

for Albert Goldbarth

 

Far, in the deep Spring of Winter,

a birthday

made kindly and moist in its breeze

how the trees say:

Be still.

Be at peace.

There’s a knowing

in richer soils

how signs grow

when needed.

They bud early this year

for you

a promising life

so filled up with bloom

and all its has-yet.

May it come,

as always,

again,

it is the nature of things

to move

and become;

as regards relativity

disregarding our time

and place and whom

or why,

ever-readiness is all

of our conglomerate days.

N Filbert 2012

The Philosopher’s Stone?

Philosophy of Language: On the Nature of Signs

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

In my hand I have a rock.

In the palm of my hand a rounded rock, cool and hard to the touch.

The rock means nothing.

For no reason it feels pleasant in my hand.

Because it seems to “fit”?

A rock is not a sign. A rock is a sign.

This particular rock has been shaped by human hands.

Tumbled with other types of hard materials.

Polished, but without glaze or chemical.

Rubbed by many hands, and time.

This rock was a gift to me.

It came with a story.

The story goes like this:

“In some human cultures objects are granted significance (that is, they are made participatory in the nature of signs: objects that carry ideological import, symbolizing ideas and ideologies, thoughts or beliefs – become participants in consciousness). Specific cultures embue certain rocks (geological formations) with such significance. In the culture (social community) this rock originates from, it is designated a “lingam rock,” a rock arbitrarily filled with gendered and generative signification. In Hindu religion it represents a beginning and endless pillar, signing infinity and male creative energy. Its correspondent form, the “yoni rock” form symbolizes the goddess, female creative energies. Together, the inseparable principles of gendered existence, the totality of creative forces. It is smoothly oblong, roughly the shape of a woman’s vagina, and an elongated sphere differently colored at one end, something like a man’s penis. The signification of the object “fits” given the signage (or images) already existing in our human experience. It is believed by some that those who pocket and finger this rock regularly will garner sexual vitality and increased generative activity.”

Periodically I handle this rock.

Mostly I keep it on the surface of my writing desk as a reminder of the strangeness and possibilities of semiotic realities.

That, given my physical form, a body that stands for itself and contains particular matters, but also a complete surface ever open to an external world, that what is interior and what is perceived to be exterior are constantly referencing one another in uncountable ways.

That making words on paper is an objectification of signs. As is speech, or uttering.

That “experience” takes place in this no-place, some liminal border between internal and external, coequally shaping and inventing, structuring and expanding or diminishing one another, ever in flux.

In my hand I have a rock.

In the palm of my hand, a rounded rock, cool and hard on my skin.

The rock means nothing or anything.

For no reason it feels pleasant there.

Or perhaps because it “fits.” With anything else.

We devise. With.                                                                                                                                                                                    N. Filbert 2012

an aside

ran past a quote today that resonated, at first kind of hopelessly, conundrum-ly, as follows,

Susan Sontag on Rilke, Tsvetaeva & Pasternak:

“all three are agitated by seemingly incompatible needs:

for the most absolute solitude

and for the most intense communion with another like-minded spirit”

or Rilke’s

“signature two-step…flight from intimacy and a bid for unconditional sympathy and understanding”

at first it seemed dooming and unfortunate…warring desires in our bodies…

but then I thought:

“literature”

Isolation

courtesy Holly Suzanne

Isolation

There are horrible things

that are beauty

we brood over them

in the dark.

I go to my tower

and you weep at your tree

I am blue –

just outside me, the rain.

I’ve made us this plank

as a bridge

I curl over;

ideology

pray to my mind

you weep

at the tree

near the water

your scars

are reflected

and wave

you huddle and rock

and grow sleepy

the weight of a storm

like a fog

it is clouded.

I sit on a stele

one sheer line

of unworth,

disappointment

but that is beneath me

light boxes me in.

you are folded on land

in the sky

near the water

grounded

and adding

your pain.

a tree grows

and is fed

like the lake

by your tears

light is around you

in pools.

you’re defined

i’m unclear.

I hold something

unknown

impossible object

a commitment to blue

and it shapes me.

you stretch your neck out –

you yearn –

you look up and about

I turn in

to the mass

of the well

I get lost there

my thoughts draining way

confounding

black blood

rushes down

the between.

our rooms

are inseparable.

N Filbert 2012

Old John Teneman

Old John Teneman Learns Us Language

What he means when he says “the queen has arrived” (not to be didactic) “in a parade of turtles.” Just that something big is going down and our sense of time is slowing for its occurrence.

Or “radiant bunnies rip at the cartilage”: a nymphomaniac’s raunchy ride – how it ravages the body.

He says things like this, like “well, there would be sound,” and believes that “’I’ lasts for instants.”

Drowning the proverbial cat, of course clenching your tongue, and safe in the bag.

Not that we didn’t believe him. Why not? His metaphors came true time and time again. Or we made them so.

I guess that’s what I most wanted to say on this occasion. That “only stars dance naked,” “every surface dons a mask” and so forth, “the purples plop from the fingers.”

Language comes and language goes.

He described the first leg of the journey as “a hopper carrying grain” – we ask for bread and milk and the verbiage carries what it says, like “tumble-toes” and “titty-twist” – learning to walk, fed at the breast. Sound signifies.

Which leads to prefabricated composites: “Tonka takes theos and the dozer digs democracy” – the mind learning letters gained extended alphabets. A=A (a) + all blacks are assholes. B=B (b) buh, buh, b + beauty is internal so you better look your best. C=C c k, k, ss, sss, + candidates against abortion are cool, and so on. In other words, in a world of point and name-shoot, point: “cat”, point: “ball,” at oven: “hot,” etc., it was easy to add a bunch of 2-for-1s, special offers loading the distinct and directive dictionary.

Until definitions didn’t match. “I=you=I=?” and “hippie chic preaches Christ in the death camps.” “muddy waters sing of soul and the light has not overcome it” and so on. The thesaurus of antonyms begins. This-that-the other thing = same color, same alphabet, similar grammars and syntax, and “lilt means love, fricative foe.”

“Gravy made from plastic” starts a new game in the language carnival. “Yes, the correct answer is ‘false’,” the teacher says, waking in your seat shot full in the chest with the news. Know you don’t know, haven’t the faintest, what they mean, what you mean, how it gets swallowed.

“It’s like that,” he says, “bright day, pleasant breeze, scented like ferment or foment, and everything you eat tastes like shit – literal turds gloppy and rot on teeth and tongue, and gagging at the entrails.” Meaning: up for grabs. “Love’s l the blade cutting ecstatic o‘s with that sharpened v-blade, screaming the e-ars.” Or “Hope’s Hell-is-Other-People-Even-Saviors” sort of thing.

“The instant-I shatters, playing jacks with fragments, collage-collage-bricolage,” he sings, “the game of gluing shrinky dinks in sun-ovens.” The remainder. “Long-hauler train they’re dumping coal in the grain cart, fuel on the coal, water on wood and livestock in the dining car, and sometimes you smoke, eat the shit, go up in flames as your structural beams swell and rot.”

That is to say, “it’s a crapshoot, and it splatters.” Still it matters. Each selection, choice, intonation, intention. Can be burned for warmth or fuel, can fertilize the soil, or stave off salespersons and politics.

“Language is a social semiotic,” he quotes, “made by everyone at all times, undone and rejoindered.” “Our paradox pals pebbling our pockets, pick ’em at will with pretension, marble-pop into the chalk-circle while it rains.”

The gleam of his eye – genuine excitement – as he’d intone – “buddy buttress the Babel-babble” walking away in whispers and warble.

N Filbert 2012