This person makes an enormous difference in my life.
Tag: learning
Spilling the Marbles
Spilling the Marbles
Which got me thinking (a process I’d describe as internal), about how we find things out when we act.
My wife was talking (a process I’d call external), about what occurs for her when she journals (with a physical pen or pencil on physical paper). Which she described as “internal processing,” (an activity I’d designate externalizing), whereby she mysteriously splits herself into observer and subject at once, providing case-notes or records of the interaction. (Did I listen well?). The arm a kind of thread-of-self arcing out to the needle of a writing instrument, jittering and inscribing its EKG-like “reading” onto the blank pages and looping back in for more. The self as inkwell?
My body hitched at this. Read: torso clinched and weather vane set spinning in grey matter. Like I might if someone told me “god told me to…”, or that they were “inspired by the Muse,” or “carried away by the spirit” and whatnot. A reaction remote from wife’s account – so what was happening for me? In other words, am I re-enacting her activity presently?
There’s the thinking part, surely. And then there’s the intention to find something out – observation, attention, inquiry – “why did I cinch up at that depiction?”, “what felt ‘off’ to me in that account (as related to my own experience)?”, “what was I ‘feeling’”?
I felt uncomfortable, that’s what. Squirmy, antsy, bothered. Was that chemically induced, like overall mood-disorder stuff, or related to her message? I thought about this, and now I’m writing about thinking about it – what’s the difference?
It leaves traces? It does. And so?
I’m making something of it? I suppose. Why? How? And – ?
Why? Hmmmm. It comforts me to write. Like organizing marbles on a tabletop. It diverts my attention.
To the marbles.
Ah, yes. That’s it, exactly.
That is to say (in this case silently with tangible markings), the reason I am unable to identify with my wife’s remarks about writing about thinking about her “self,” is that I get distracted. In my head, it’s a swirl of sounds and concepts, images and sensation-symbols or impulses infiltrating and becoming one another like smoke strands in an overturned glass. But transforming to paper it becomes language, marbles, metaphors.
Some whispering gap of translation. I wouldn’t have thought marbles on a tabletop or envisioned smoke swirling in an upside-down glass – what would be the point? Do I need to describe myself to myself? Could I even? Deceive myself so? But through a medium – a thick, loamy, granular medium like language – that’s cause for intention, apparatus of selection and choice, opportunities outside the body, drawn from the big wide world. That’s external, that’s INTERACTION with a history, a culture, and a society of humans that gave rise to its agreements and standards, components and flavors and rules.
Jolting out through the arm via muscle controllers and a mechanical tool, I’m participant far outside my finite organism – in contents and structures, systems and meanings way beyond my doing or the thinks I might think. The threads that I sew, the fabric I stitch in, the stylus, ink and letters I write are not mine – the pen, paper, leaves, spark, or smoke emitted into the clear crystal container all already exist, given or available, as it were, to me.
It’s hard to find the part I play in the process, or how the words relate to me – more like the words relate me – render me relatable – if I’m able to finagle myself to their categories and nuances.
So it is (for me) as if the movement to write is spilling the marbles – turning me out of myself into a world where language matters – discursive, discussive, dialogically or to some expressive purpose – catching at these rolling targets and corralling them toward some organizational assemblage (that, I suppose, being my part in the meaningful game). I pick the red one and set it there, not there. Or prefer the one with the chip in it next to the tiger’s eye, and so forth. (There’s no accounting for taste – is that “style”? (Really!?)).
So “what have I written?” I think, and I’m sure I don’t know, but thanks for the language and time, it’s a process – and now you have the bagful of marbles…
Happy Thanksgiving!!
Wobbling
What I might name or designate, “the Here.” The present. Synonym to “only.” That there are not points in time.
Perhaps always movement. Have we uncovered something that is still? Not that I know of. But perhaps. What do we call it?
Rather IS-ness is what I’m referring to. Things that ARE. NOT eternally the same. NOT really able (reliable) to be depended on or assumed. NOT all-anything, omni-nihilism. But movement, active, undergoing change (literally – in way less than fractions of milliseconds – remember, we’re talking about things that ARE – no fractions). Like a rock, or an ocean, a sense-of-self or single cell.
Truly momentary, present-ly – precisely why the adverb was made – to come closer to experience, reality, in its motion and manner, without fantasizing it into a definable, locatable, or measurable.
While all is wobbly and wobbling – shifting, bouncing, deteriorating, expanding, dancing, vibrating, whatever – once in a while things wobble together (actually, constantly), and when certain things do (oscillation, pulse, a kind of unison rhythm), moments also occur (to us).
Never resumed, never recalled, never predicted. Ever occurring. It is shaky, reality.
N Filbert 2012
To Grow
try driving through the Flint Hills in Kansas
with accompaniment
And yet
shuffling through my papers and bags from the “vacation”-ing, I found these pages…uncertain what more to do with them…
The Advance
In the looping that making is
swing back
tie around
and move forward,
if you make it through
you will stretch toward
if not
you will bunch up
stopped and
knotted,
held
somehow in a form;
The passing through –
the trick of things –
like camels
and eyes of needles
or coyotes
tricking their prey –
Not always,
but sometimes,
it works.
More prevalently
we create bonds
that only loosen
when undone
or serve
to strangle
Neither / nor
Either / or
a kind of be / have
if you will
you will feel
that you won’t
but no matter
Letters are made
for the unconscious
something akin to
shorthand,
symbols,
drawing
from metaphorical wells
their multi-meanings,
depending on
what’s growing there.
Here.
Now.
For instance
finding what you’ve put away
if not uncovered,
comes in snippets.
Like remembering
we advance
in casting back and forth
across a scene –
it’s only details
attention finds
and alters
with the looking
like a spy
proffers suspicion
or a guru
marking growth
it’s in our nature –
though we cannot know that –
in our nature too
the combination:
imagination
and desire,
a synonym
for knowledge
if we “get it.”
I don’t get it,
I be / have
and therefore lose
much of what I had coming
Alas, but it is day
and meaning rises
first one thing
and then another
by my measure,
inaccurately
distinct
and untoward;
we have our myths –
our dreams and visions –
our feeble truths
for what they’re worth,
a clumsy journeying
toward
death
when be and have
are one (none)
N Filbert 2012
A different kind of personal (2)
secondly,
a fresh stack from the library yesterday…to soak into…
The Essential Peirce (vol. 1) – my hero
How to Live, or, A Life of Montaigne: In One Question and Twenty Attempts at an Answer by Sarah Blakewell
The Shallows: What the Internet is Doing to Our Brains by Nicholas Carr
Of Learned Ignorance by Nicolas Cusanus
The Book of Dead Philosophers by Simon Critchley
The Temptation to Exist by E.M. Cioran
great philosophers who failed at love by andrew shaffer
Signeponge by Jacques Derrida
Drawing from the Glyptothek by Jim Dine
joy!
