Posting an ongoing project, a long(ish) poem(-tic) reflexive effort to at least hear myself if not understand.
The Engineer of Himself
The Engineer of Himself: A Poem
“Thinking is willing you are wild
to the weave not to material itself”
Susan Howe
“a new music of verse stretching out into the future…”
William Carlos Williams on Louis Zukofsky
I.
I have tried to tell this story time and time again.
I’ve set out to tell this story.
This one story. This one, apparently, mine.
This story takes all of my life, as do all of the stories that go deep in the mines.
Mole’s holes without boundaries – forward and back equal speed – ever the hunting, never the full.
We develop our routes in this way.
Creating patterns.
We forget so many channels and tunnels and homes.
Will I ever find the subject
When asked what I am writing?
Writing here
Subjects are subjected to such tiny worlds
There are objects too
That also serve as subjects
All we’re subject to.
I have this body, this is mine,
It covers and fills me entire
And then it reaches, reaches,
Forages out and it moves,
Colliding and grasping and pushing away
I have this body, this mine.
With a mind
With a mind to
With a penchant toward action
Toward distress
De-stress, this dress
Toward persons, places and things
Toward world
From within, without
So without makes it in.
I mine there
Mining without
Without tools or fuels or jewels
So I fashion, construct
Supplying from within what’s without
And I’m borrowing here,
Collaging weapons and stories and finds
In this purely without of a mind.
Forging no need was illusion
Drawing on nothing as air
Fantasy, drama and dream
Phantom limbs, phantom words, phantom truths
and structures
and patterns
that never add up or complete
only fail
only lie
without the whole story
what’s left in the mines
what’s already become
something else
without, me
II.
“Each syllable an instance
of ourselves bodied forth in the
dimness…
—
…the voice which occurs all the time
while everything else is happening”
-Ron Loewinsohn-
Here I am drawing on Zukofsky
on Wittgenstein, Blanchot
all the others too
because language
is that pre-fab tool
that we fabricate
for ourselves
as it manufactures us
Help outside
no help
coming through, as it does
inside, after all,
helping to shape
and discover,
lending forms
and definition
to experiences
otherwise improbable
ineffable
unknown
remaining still
outside words’ purview
but almost communicative
almost expressed
anyway, all ways
that come down to
into, as possibles.
Rearrange.
Bakhtin, semiotic Ecos,
Sebeok, Halliday, Firth and Peirce
not forgetting Uexkull
nor leaving him aside
in his thousands of worlds
circling our own
so Susan Howe and Lyn
Hejinian, Arakawa and Gins
add their genes
to my braiding strand
Creeley Olson Williams
that Wallace Stevens says.
Engineering himself
with parts ready made
collage and cross-breeding
in chaos of happenstance
accord.
What with friendship
and love
those I-Vs
as in injections
through slap
and its waking
like alien probes
something happens
and goes on
no controlling the architect
who is many
and not yet done
will be never
without any plans
just a tinkering
of billions
of metaphorical hands
like sky
and crows
and water
and cells
air-breath
sorrows
stew pot
of whatever’s
alive
and quite probable,
then some
we call “context”
“situation”
the world enough
and time
we go down in
and on
fecund.
III.
If asked to say myself, what would it be that I might say?
I’d say “selfless” but not as altruism, rather stuck
at a crossroad of enough sensation to feel responsible
but not enough to seem of value yet.
I.e. I’ve never known the underwritten sense of being “good enough”
or “good just as I am”
rather ever the hunch that something’s missing.
or someone.
entity that might provide worth. Inherently.
A.k.a. “identity.”
It seemed safer to keep to myself,
which I have never found,
perhaps stumbled across from time to time
with no one to confirm.
From early on it’s been piano and pen –
attempts to confirm for myself
I have effects.
Or that I am and at least possess matter
whether that “matters” or not
I can draw lines and shape letters
that others might read…really,
or punch holes in the air against keys
resulting in sound as a response to such grasping
It’s a striving for verification, really.
an undeniable act of “to be.”
Thinking
that if I could see it, or hear,
perceptively in some way,
there must be a someone behind it,
in fact, a name that I’ve employed
for myself – simply “Someone”
among so many others, hardly
distinguishable, but not without
the grave desire so “to be.”
Someone.
Which brings me to now
and surrounding effects –
there are spouses and children
and pages and friends
sounds and writings and pictures
various artifacts,
even skin I count now
and its pains
as evidence that I might
be here
now.
And have matter
that matters
to some.
never certain.
What’s called “passing fancy”
or “passing away”
like seasons and bodies and grass
so – how much?
Not very.
But still.
I am here
and I love
I reach out
and effect
readily verifiable
as pain.
Still undecided
as “good.”
IV.
There are things that ask themselves,
are asked of you
your selves
we, an assemblage of language,
of contexts invested, invented, infested,
with meanings,
with signs,
with billions of shorthands,
short-handed always
for something else,
it begs the question
asking itself
our selves
where we come from
as if a nexus of webbing
were stilled for a moment
could be located
but isn’t
it can’t
so no answers are given
rather various strands
at sundry intervals
depending
on the angling
of the web
we ask ourselves
it asks itself
through us
as if a part
of our machinations
were so simple
as to run
that way,
on questioning.
I ask myself,
engineering my selves
pretending to manage
operations
like instructions
booklets
pamphlets
fragments
of the origins
of stones
and cells
and butterfly’s wings
whence also
my individuated (as in differing, deferring)
DNA
Do Not Answer
is what the question is
being
just another way
to leave
a particular mark
– ? –
always shared in common
but variously inked
or stroked
or spoken
while walking
falling
singing,
standing,
positioning doesn’t matter
and makes all the difference
in the world
if you’re asking.
I am
V. in Appropriate Voicing
He works at the only solution…
what calculates being binary
operations in two hemispheres
He will attempt to inhabit between
to increase the materials colossally
And therefore to add
or perhaps even multiply
subtracting divisions en route
Working a solution
without equation
only a means of figuring
what it is that might be here
or there
the wherever of whatever
simply a matter
of when
He writes
scribbling a mannered matter
extracting doodles
impacting his geometries.
The earth is round
in an oblong way
like all ideas of perfection
so as not to fall
He slides
working his hands into cracks
in futile attempts to grab hold
He won’t
having already shifted
by the time
his digits arrive
He will go on measuring land
by feel
a task for stitching the meanings
together
unwound in the act of threading
ripped out
by his dreams in the night
which work toward the final solution,
inevitably
a silencing of the two spheres
deformed so very anonymously
in the only way it ends
carrying on
toward
dis-solution…
VI.
If I am here,
it’s as dispersion.
I am here.
I open out
What exists
through contact
I learn my boundaries
are sometimes shared
as margins
I sense
a threshold
for encounter
to disperse
in borders
commingled present
here, and now,
a kind of always
where I will be
Like a shadow
or a field
a range of action
acted on
therefore distinct
and altogether
the one and the other(s)
textiling
what is
here
now
I declare
it makes no difference
I am here
is different from
the declaration
also here
and in relation
to
the one and the many
indistinguishable
and uniquely so
in location
and extension,
duration
and occurrence,
the only here
is we.
I create myself
accordingly
as I’m created,
simultaneous construction(s);
what is not
identifies
what it is
and thus becomes
it as well
I am a spectrum
and dispersion
and an othering
at once –
shadows within shadows
of shadows in a field
we become
VII. What We Do With Who We Are
Seems a likely story in the making (of either the doing or the being)
Given the limitations
speaking of time
thinking of space
or energy – matter – duration.
We repeated: the stars burned out
hundreds of thousands of them
years ago
and the news
has yet
to reach us
i.e. things are relative
like we, one to another,
and all the possible rest
in terms of potentia
inactual
capacity vs. reality
and also such part of it.
“I remember –“
we sometimes say
concocting a story
toward what is needed,
an age-old habit
of recurrence
thus the doing
effects the being
in its reversals
and translations
or
where do predilections
spring?
e.g. nothing is left
to its own devices
and if it were
(if it could be)
would we have being
in itself
without an object
to act against
(without its doing?)
I wouldn’t know
without a something
so I guess hardly.
As it were.
With a measurable body
(apparent limitation)
height and weight
shape and number
identify by more
& you have a name
not definition
the truth is like that
I often say,
explaining nothing
in vague depictions.
Even what’s specific
or precise
is mystical and vague
from variant positions
called perspective
another name
limited by what senses
And what else is there?
in the being and its actions
than these limits
of description?
One wants to wonder
but can’t go out
or further on
than where
or what
one is
When.
Which equals how,
finally,
a resolution
of the doing
of the being
that interests me.
She’d call it “process”
in the “system”
of “relations” –
their between –
Gymnastic open language
that I like
but don’t really
understand
being
part of it
during all
and never
after.
Which gives pause
to cause reflection –
a kind of
recollecting
toward the future –
what we do
with who we are.
Wow. Nice to read someone with vaulting ambition in a project. Much respect.
thank you
This is excellent piece… Deeply expressed… I love your philosophical and poetical touches. Thank you dear N Filbert, love, nia
Reblogged this on photographyofnia and commented:
This is great piece…
Thanks for reading Nia, always