…and wonderings about language as a tool and an abstract medium. Wondering if in the endless bewilderment of experience – of living – rife with woundings and joys – we move to shared media, providing communally devised realms in which to re-vision, simultaneously creating new life, wherewith and wherein to investigate and inquire, to dig and dig and…
Language as constructed or agreed-upon and functional (tool) medium.
Then there’s this full of resonances and also contributing to the reflections – required text of a current course:

…and I quote:
“As the reader gropes the stacks – lifting books and testing their heft, appraising the fall of letterforms on the title page, scrutinizing marks left by other readers – the more elusive knowledge itself becomes. All that remains unknown seems to beckon from among the covers, between the lines. In the library, the reader is wakened from the dream of communion with a single book, startled into a recognition of the word’s materiality by the sheer number of bound volumes; by the sound of pages turning, covers rubbing; by the rank smell of books gathered together in vast numbers…the physicality of the book is strongest in libraries, where the accumulated weight of written words seems to exert a gravity all its own.”
“So the library is a body, too, the pages of books pressed together like organs in the darkness…[in libraries] I can fool myself that the universe is composed of infinite variations of a single element – the book – that I, too, am made of books, like the person in Giuseppe Arcimboldo‘s painting The Librarian“
“…a person made of books; his is not a single book but a whole library”
“I have the distinct impression that the millions of volumes may indeed contain the entirety of human experience: that they make not a model for but a model of the universe.”
“…texts, fabrics to be shredded and woven together in new combinations and patterns…”
“everything in the world exists to end up in a book” (Stephane Mallarme)
“With their leaves of fiber, their inks of copperas and soot, and their words – books are an amalgam of [Roger Bacon‘s] three classes of substance capable of magic: the herbal, the mineral, and the verbal”
“For any question, the library offers no hope of a definitive answer…unlimited and cyclical”
“Together they tell us stories that they could not tell alone”
“In many places, the volumes are thick with dust, pocked with the holes left by insects,
which are almost as hungry for books as I“
-all quotes except where noted – Matthew Battles Library: An Unquiet History
And somehow I can’t help but think the interface and interstice of languaging matter in this way – a way that provides comfort and the slightest skin of distance from the raw inside of skin – inseparable recursions – but mediated immediately – kind of like magic; a LOT like alchemy; always experience – but less abrasive or intrusive than “direct.” Perhaps paint, light, cameras and brushes, clay, etc – any art that borrows matter outside the body – similarly provides a soluble, gentled, media through which to live forward…
…in other words…are our preferences for embodiment a part of what define us as artists in the societal mesh? The media through which we most naturally express or experience or embody indicative? Textuality as embodiment for the writer; clay, stone, marble, etc. for the sculptor; movement for the dancer; oil, pigment, brush, etc. for the painter; lines for the draughtsman and so on…